Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 1381 - 1400 of 9,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2010, 11:33 am by Vincent LoTempio
The American Inventors Protection Act, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
 The part of Garcia that would keep me up at night if I worked for a Hollywood studio is buried in section 203 of the Copyright Act:  any “transfer or license of copyright or of any right under a copyright executed by the author on or after January 1, 1978 . . . is subject to termination” 35 years after it was executed, under the conditions set forth in that provision. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Trial Judge #1 holds one case must instead go to a different circuit; Trial Judge #2 holds the other does not. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 9:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
REV. 709, 710 (2012)Reference 107 is to 320 U.S. 1; 63 S. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:00 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
How Long Does it Take for the Patent Office to Look at National Entry Papers? [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:28 am by Alex Gasser
  Assuming that the specification of the ‘592 patent provides adequate support for the “extracting means” limitation of claim 1 and assuming that claim 1 is not directed to the disparaged problem in the prior art, does the specification provide adequate support for “a selector device” and “a location name display device” recited in claim 1 to satisfy the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Thirty-two states are acting to pass laws or regulations to require sales tax collection by remote sellers now or in the immediate future: Preexisting prior to Wayfair: Pennsylvania & Rhode Island (both give retailers a choice between collecting tax or complying with notice-and-reporting laws) July 1, 2018: Colorado (notice-and-reporting only), Hawaii, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Vermont September 1, 2018: Mississippi October 1, 2018: Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky,… [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Unlike Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(e)(1) – (2), California law does not impose a continuing duty on a party to supplement their interrogatory or document responses. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Unlike Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(e)(1) – (2), California law does not impose a continuing duty on a party to supplement their interrogatory or document responses. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 11:41 pm
The PCT application (with a priority claim to a U.S. application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a)) is filed with the USPTO (See Case 1) or the PCT application has been filed directly (without a priority claim) with the USPTO (See Case 2).The PCT application has not entered the national phase in the JPO.A first action on the merits by the USPTO(i) for the U.S. application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) is/will be completed within 26 months from the filing date of that U.S.… [read post]
2 May 2010, 11:13 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
  Sections 34-35 of the Criminal Code does provide a self-defence in light of aggression, but this is limited to those who are the target of the assault. [read post]