Search for: "Ely Lilly"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 2,157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
This year's version, subtitled "Maximising pharmaceutical patent lifecycles to foster innovation and growth", takes place at The Hotel Excelsior, Munich, from 22 to 23 June and is followed by a Masterclass on 24 June on how to draft solid pharma patent claims in light of the CJEU's rulings in Neurim, Medeva, Georgetown, Eli Lilly and Actavis v Sanofi. [read post]
14 May 2018, 12:30 pm
Birss would not be drawn on his views of the Supreme Court's decision in Eli Lilly v Actavis (see the IPKat here - the 109 comments on the post is a good indication of how controversial this decision has been). [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:11 am
See In re Eli Lilly, 902 F.2d 943 (Fed. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 3:41 am
On the side he collected antique hand tools, which proved a vital pastime: In the 1960s he sold his collection of tools to the Eli Lilly Company for a considerable sum, and in 1969 he used the proceeds to buy a building in SoHo, a neighborhood that was about to transition from industrial to trendy. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:28 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 78 [week ending on Sunday 27 December] – Zer-sum claim and lookalike products | 2015 Copyright Awards | Santa Claus and Section 52 | Jani writes on Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited | IP Hairballs | Actavis v Eli Lilly | Power outage at USPTO | Santa's GC resigns | Pet rock and IP.Never too late 77 [week ending on Sunday 20… [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
[If you want some handy tips on how to speed-read all those comments, try the Wired How-To Wiki, here] In case you missed it, Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc UKSC 2012/0220 is not going on appeal to the United Kingdom's Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 1:34 am
Never too late 78 [week ending on Sunday 27 December] – Zer-sum claim and lookalike products | 2015 Copyright Awards | Santa Claus and Section 52 | Jani writes on Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited | IP Hairballs | Actavis v Eli Lilly | Power outage at USPTO | Santa's GC resigns | Pet rock and IP.Never too late 77 [week ending on Sunday 20 December] – GC on 5-stripe shoe mark | EPO BoA… [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 2:48 pm
Few would deny patents to Genetch, Eli Lilly, Biogen and others as they develop drugs that deal with Alzheimer’s and dementia, look for cures for diabetes, and create titanium hips and better pacemakers. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:45 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 12:55 pm
See Eli Lilly, 119 F.3d at 1568 (“A written description of an invention involving a chemical genus, like a description of a chemical species, ‘requires a precise definition, such as by structure, formula, [or] chemical name,’ of the claimed subject matter sufficient to distinguish it from other materials. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:24 am
The USTR letter also indicates that the administration intends to maintain the controversial Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions of NAFTA, which allowed pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly to sue Canada for the country's decision not to grant two drug patents. [read post]
18 May 2018, 5:25 am
Eli Lilly& Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 2:48 pm
Eli Lilly, 376F.3d at 1359. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:25 pm
The Committee's Co-Chair, Thierry Calame (Lenz & Staehelin) closed the session by leading the discussion of an expert panel of distinguished guests including Niclas Morey (EPO), Judge Meier-Beck (Presiding Judge of the German Federal Court of Justice), Larry Welch (Eli Lilly), Tina Chappell (Intel) and Michael Fröhlich. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am
Upreti first discusses the role of national law in such major IP-related ISDS case, Philip Morris v Uruguay, Eli Lilly v Canada, Bridgestone v Panama, and Einarsson v Canada [also commented by The IPKat here and here]. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:06 am
This year's paper was arguably made even more challenging by the introduction on the syllabus for the first time of the principles of the doctrine of equivalents as established by Lord Neuberger in Actavis v Eli Lilly (which even UK judges are still working out how to apply...). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
If last year’s Supreme Court case in Actavis v Eli Lilly is to be taken as a guide, the Court may take around three months to make its judgment available. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 1:05 pm
“20k is small change, and they can justify it easily if they want to be at the table,” one professor wrote to the other after an Eli Lilly representative objected to the price. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm
Darren Smyth (photo: Neil Graveney)The equivalents were a terrible idea, said Darren Smyth commenting on Actavis v Eli Lilly from the UK Supreme Court, which established that an infringed claim could be wider than the claim wording. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:06 pm
But, according to AboutLawsuits.com, the BMJ editors also noted that Young has served as an advisor for major drug companies that manufacture drugs to treat some mental disorders, including AstraZeneca, which makes Seroquel, Lundbeck, which makes Abilify and Lexapro, and Eli Lilly, which makes Prozac. [read post]
