Search for: "International Materials, Inc."
Results 1381 - 1400
of 7,053
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
Dynegy, Inc., 344 F.3d 446, 451 (5th Cir. 2003) (“[T]he existence of a license authorizing the use of copyrighted material is an affirmative defense to an allegation of infringement .... [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 9:06 pm
Peggy Lawton Kitchens, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
Co., Inc., 703 F.2d 1372, 217 USPQ 505, 509 (Fed. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Accordingly, Section 1292(b) allows a district court to certify an issue for interlocutory appeal when: (1) the challenged ruling involves controlling questions of law, (2) there is substantial ground for difference of opinion on the ruling, and (3) an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 12:25 pm
Hein & Co., Inc., International Citator and Research Guide (The Greenbook), can fill the gaps and be a good companion to your Bluebook. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:10 pm
Paula Hawkins put it: “[S]ince judges are ruling against the administration [with regard to Haitian asylum cases], we are going to stop [the Haitians] before they get here” (p. 7). [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
I have written about the upcoming conference: Super-Scoring? [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 9:14 am
On September 4, 2019, the DOJ filed an antitrust lawsuit in the Northern District of Ohio to block Novelis Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 7:21 am
Gentile has admitted only that “material weaknesses” exist in their internal controls. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38 [2006]; see EBC I, Inc. v Goldman, Sachs & Co., 5 NY3d 11, 19 [2005]; Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d 1093, 1095 [2014]). [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:28 am
Armstrong International, Inc., No. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 12:59 pm
Durkin, exercising his “inherent authority” and acting at the urging of an objecting shareholder, has “abrogated” the settlement of the litigation arising out of the acquisition of Akorn , Inc. by Frensenius Kabi AG, and ordered the plaintiffs’ lawyers to return to Akorn their $322,000 mootness fee, ruling that the additional disclosures to which the company agreed were “worthless to shareholders” and that the underlying lawsuits should have… [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
FFPs were adopted in high profile initial public offerings, such as that of Snap, Inc., with the specific goal of restricting lawsuits for material misstatements or omissions in the IPO documents to federal courts. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
FFPs were adopted in high profile initial public offerings, such as that of Snap, Inc., with the specific goal of restricting lawsuits for material misstatements or omissions in the IPO documents to federal courts. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:41 pm
” (internal quotation marks and citationomitted)). [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:52 am
Drape Creative, Inc., 909 F.3d 257, 264 (9th Cir. 2018). [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 9:03 pm
Almark Foods Inc. [read post]
failure to disprove other possible sources of sales defeats irreparable harm in false ad/patent case
23 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
Citrix Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
Mastercard International Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:58 am
Stamer’s clients include employers and other workforce management organizations; employer, union, association, government and other insured and self-insured health and other employee benefit plan sponsors, benefit plans, fiduciaries, administrators, and other plan vendors; domestic and international public and private health care, education and other community service and care organizations; managed care organizations; insurers, third-party administrative services… [read post]
