Search for: "Likely v. State" Results 1381 - 1400 of 82,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2019, 6:22 am by Ronald Mann
After the argument involving Second Amendment rights in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:26 am by Lyle Denniston
The eagerly awaited oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by INFORRM
Logically, MTE v Hungary would thus need to be distinguished from Delfi v Estonia. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am by Florian Mueller
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:37 am by Holly
January 5, 2023  |  By: Ryan Kennedy On November 7, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Virginia decided the case of Harrell v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 1:09 pm
There are undoubtedly political upsides and downsides of living in a state like California, in which the relevant political branches are left of center. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Supreme Court, in its 5-4 decision today in Shelby v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In short, in an appropriate case, a closed procedure would be more likely than PII to achieve justice through a fair trial. b) No defence The trouble with a case like Al Rawi is that the government parties defending the action have to certify PII in respect of certain evidence, but they cannot rely on it at the trial and are therefore unable to defend the action. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 6:19 am by J. Adam Engel
  This First Amendment check on government investigative activities was most famously explored in the United States Supreme Court in NAACP v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Toxic Debris Makes Ambler ‘Look Like A Third World Country,’ Says Asbestos Disease Awareness Advocate, August 20, 2015, CBS News, by Justin Udo More Blog Entries: Bostic v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Lisa Salazar
Specifically K-V wants a ban on the importation of all 17 HPC “except as authorized by [K-V]” and to prevent the sale or solicitation of 17 HPC within the United States from any imported source unless authorized by K-V. [read post]