Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 1381 - 1400 of 20,066
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
T 198/84) requires that the following criteria be taken into consideration: the selected sub-range has to be (a) narrow, which is doubtlessly the case here (20 nm) and (b) sufficiently far removed from the known boundary values and examples, respectively, which is also the case here. [read post]
13 Feb 2006, 12:01 pm by Unknown
For these, the court rejected the motions to extend the stay on the basis that the notice was inadequate (leading me to wonder, why didn't the court simply reschedule the hearing to afford at least 20 days' notice?). [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Though Apple might be able to show its qualifications as a defense, this wasn’t enough as a matter of law to require dismissal. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:54 am by Jeffrey
Don't forget to subscribe to this feed in your feed reader (we recommend Google Reader). [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Jayme Soulati
If the seeker is not informed, they must count to 100 and, instead, they only count to 10, the hiders don’t have time to find their hideaway. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:04 pm by Thorsten Bausch
Thorsten BauschThe much awaited decision T 1063/18 by Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04 in a five-member composition has been published today. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 12:56 am by Rose Hughes
Indeed, with decisions like T 1688/20 from the EPO Boards of Appeal, it can only be a matter of time before an equivalent defence becomes necessary to avoid English patent law becoming nonsensical. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Membership in a Rule 23(b)(2) class is “mandatory,” as “[t]he Rule provides no opportunity for (b)(1) or (b)(2) class members to opt out, and does not even oblige the District Court to afford them notice of the action. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:02 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"Let's be clear: A) This was happening for DECADES before Black Lives Matter was on the scene, and B) the county NOT letting defendants be advised by lawyers at bail hearings was a big part of the suit! [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:20 am by Hal Singer
When asked what Deutsche Telekom plans to do with its U.S. assets now that the AT&T deal has unraveled, a company spokesman said: “There’s no Plan B. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:31 am by FHH Law
As we reported yesterday, the Commission’s late-October “Second Order on Reconsideration” with respect to its channel sharing rules was published in the Federal Register on November 2, even though its predecessor, last June’s “First Order on Reconsideration” in the same matter, still hadn’t graced the Register’s pages. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:58 am by Russ Bensing
   But they do a good job with 404(B) evidence, they’re excellent on search and seizure, and, as they proved again this week in State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
--Instead, [t]he Supreme Court's Twombly formulation of the pleadingstandard can be summed up thus:>stating ... a claim requires a complaint with enough factual matter (taken as true) to suggest the required element ... [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am by John-Paul Boyd KC
These statements give me a buffet of uncontested facts from which to draw without the necessity of reconciling the version of events provided by Party A with those provided by Party B. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:48 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Applicant stated that she completed the accommodation forms (Forms A and B) required by defendant, but her request was denied, and her appeal was unsuccessful. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:12 pm
[…] On March 4, 2014, the PTAB instituted CBM review for each patent, finding each challenged claim more likely than not directed to unpatentable subject matter under § 101. [read post]