Search for: "One Clothing Inc" Results 1381 - 1400 of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Vanlex Clothing Corp., 160 So. 3d 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). $1,869.72 formula fee for 75 hours of legal work = $24.92 an hour. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:29 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Towel Day is also a memorial, but a geeky one. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Towel Day is also a memorial, but a geeky one. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm by Lara
Whoa Nellie, this one has the potential to get messy! [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:49 am by Ralph L. Jacobson
But, if a parent receives financial support from their child which aids them in obtaining the things, such as shelter, clothing, food and medical treatment, which one cannot and should not do without, the parent is dependent upon their child. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the words of the California Supreme Court in Balboa Village Island Inn, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by News Desk
”  “One environmental swab collected from the floor area of (redacted) during FDA’s 2019 inspection contained L. monocytogenes. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Justice Souter concurred with one exception. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 4:04 pm by Larry Catá Backer
This shift also changes the scope of what is understood as "law" to be applied to issues of corporate governance, from one principally focused on national law to governance norms that may be sourced in the declarations and other governance interventions of public and private international bodies. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP)   Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office)  PricewaterhouseCooper report – Making the… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Techdirt) OHIM payments and bank charges (Class 46) (Class 46)   Finland Department store Stockmann seeks amicable settlement in trade mark dispute over clothing boutique Crazy’s use of identical mark HULLUT PÄIVÄT (crazy days) for bargain sale (Class 46)   France Cheese manufacturers press French government to place import duties on Coca-Cola syrup in retaliation for punitive American duty levelled on US imports of Roquefort cheese (IPKat)… [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am by Schachtman
Last week, the New York Court of Appeals, New York’s highest court, agreed to state out loud that the plaintiffs’ “every exposure” theory had no clothes, no foundation, and no science. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
She further states that she 'owns no personal property other than the furniture or clothing necessary for barest survival', and has no other resources or sources of income. [read post]