Search for: "People v. Fell"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 2,577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
” In this case, the employees were not paid by the hour, and therefore, they fell under the second category. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Here's another such case (which I think expresses what today would be the minority view), from 1913 Arkansas, Moore v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm
Later, this land became part of the Mojave National Preserve and fell under Federal management. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
Klayman v Obama in the DC Circuit and Wikimedia v NSA in the District of Maryland Sadly, 2015 saw two other cases in which courts fell for a procedural shell game the government has been pushing. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am
Design patent v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:09 pm
Kelly-Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:30 am
People usually think it's a good thing to be "on a roll." [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:44 am
Taxi Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:43 am
This event commemorated the 1967 Supreme Court case of Loving v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 12:50 am
"The right of one charged with [a] crime to counsel may not be deemed fundamental and essential to fair trials in some countries, but it is in ours"-Gideon v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:18 am
”However, Ruger explained how in the past the courts have upheld necessary restrictions on such corporate speech, but with this case the Supreme Court overturned such rulings in one fell swoop. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:49 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
It is those words that were adopted by the people. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
We don't mind people saying we're full of it, we couldn't be litigators if we did, but that should be decided on the strength of our arguments, not on which side of the "v" we reside. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:32 am
Popadopoulos v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 3:25 am
In Hopkins v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm
Those compromises often fell short of what we’d hope for in comprehensive NSA reform. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am
Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
