Search for: "People v. Summar"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 2,427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2016, 11:01 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:28 am
That is the so-called “Lemon test,” taking its name from the decision in the case of Lemon v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:31 pm
People seem to disagree about what this scholarly oeuvre adds up to: close to nothing (e.g., Paul Campos), something quite substantial (e.g., Eugene Volokh), or not particularly remarkable in either direction (e.g., Erin Miller). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:19 am
Limiting the power to authorize DNA collection to judges ensures that an adequate detachment is maintained between the investigating body and the appraiser of reasonable suspicion on which DNA collection is predicated.RetentionOnce DNA has been collected pre-trial, divergence is also evident in terms both of the period and of the form of retention.Indefinite retention of DNA was once permitted in England and Wales, but was impugned in S. and Marper v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 5:30 am
Trunk v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
Here's how I summarized the case in May:In challenging the law, plaintiffs filed affidavits that said "the individuals with whom [they] communicate include 'people the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
To summarize, I wonder who has the best claim to liberty takings compensation in the preventive detention world. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:35 am
Wallbillich summarizes law firms' challenge. ... [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 7:00 am
He also called Vladimir V. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 10:42 am
I enjoyed watching the crowd, especially the people dressed up as "Hons", and the people not dressed up as "Hons" (and the two were not that easy to tell apart). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:22 am
Ten thousand people have written about it, and most can do a much better job of summarizing the case and making it accessible to the readers. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:14 am
., who had challenged the timing and use of the jury in adjudicating his claim of death penalty ineligibility under Atkins v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
The Dormant Commerce Clause balancing test (the Pike v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:06 am
The letter noted that in the RNRL v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
And in Dayco (Canada) Limited v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
They’re not people who make causal statements going about their daily business. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
They’re not people who make causal statements going about their daily business. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 12:22 pm
Chapter 14 is largely devoted to summarizing the state of affairs in antitrust and standard setting. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Circuit ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 1:12 pm
Caleb Watney of the conservative R Street Institute recently summarized that evidence here. [read post]
