Search for: "Powell v. Powell"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2014, 9:11 am
Case after case the Supreme Court and then Court of Appeal told us so (Thurrock BC v West probably contains the best summary of where we are). [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
Powell, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbus, for Appellant Matthew Aalim Andrew T. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
Powell, where the Court held that a jury could acquit on one charge and convict on another even if the two verdicts are logically inconsistent. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
” Powell v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
In the majority opinion by Justice Powell, Mathews v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:02 am
Zorach v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
In the majority opinion by Justice Powell, Mathews v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 10:38 am
Flores (for finding Congress overstepped its Section 5 powers) and U.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
The defendant in Powell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
Grutter also reaffirmed Justice Powell’s opinion announcing the judgment of a splintered Court in Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 4:13 pm
" NRA v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
There were Powell v Birmingham Mail (Clause 1), Landers v Darlington and Stockton Times (Clause 1), Dobson v Sun (Clause 1), Fellows v Sunday Mercury (Clauses 1 and 5), Choudry v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Buchan v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Rape Crisis v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Brown v Lincolnshire Echo (Clauses 3 and 5), Cousins v Times (Clause 1). [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 9:32 pm
Brannum v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:11 am
” –Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell, to his biographer in 1991. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:58 am
Any student assignment policies that direct where individual students will be placed must, at a minimum, have to be multi-factor individualized considerations roughly akin to the sort approved in Grutter v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 8:51 am
In analogous cases like Powell v. [read post]
