Search for: "Soling v. New York State" Results 1381 - 1400 of 3,659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2017, 12:15 pm by Ilya Somin
Hsieh and Moretti (2015) have estimated that “lowering regulatory constraints” in areas like New York and Silicon Valley would “increase U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:43 am by Ned Snow
First is a ban on disparaging trademarks, and next is a ban on The New York Times. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
He moved to the United States at age 13 and attended public school in New York City. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Claiming the affirmative defense of "privilege"Casey v State of New York,  2017 NY Slip Op 01922, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentOffice of Court Administration's [OCA] sole contention is that the Court of Claims court should have found that its "detention" of Colleen Casey, a senior court officer, was privileged* on the ground that a designated superior's authority to command Casey through lawful orders carried with… [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:06 am
Posted by Ira Kay, Pay Governance LLC, on Tuesday, June 6, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Capital markets, Executive Compensation, Financial reporting, Firm performance, GAAP, Incentives, ISS, Long-Term value, Management, Pay for performance, Performance measures, Proxy advisors, Shareholder value, TSR The Failure of Federal Incorporation Law: A Public Choice Perspective Posted by Sung Hui Kim, UCLA School of Law,… [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Second, and more importantly for practitioners, Justice Emerson’s opinion is one of the very few New York state court decisions that takes a probing look at the prevailing “substantial benefit” standard for an award of legal fees under Section 626 (e). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Second, and more importantly for practitioners, Justice Emerson’s opinion is one of the very few New York state court decisions that takes a probing look at the prevailing “substantial benefit” standard for an award of legal fees under Section 626 (e). [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm by Josh Blackman
  “Facially Legitimate and Bona Fide” Mandel, joined by several other American scholars (including Noam Chomsky) brought suit in the Eastern District of New York, seeking “a declaratory judgment that on its face and as applied” that the three relevant statutory provisions were unconstitutional. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:00 am by Ruth Levush
New York State New York State Domestic Relations Laws ubjects a civil divorce, among others, to a requirement that the plaintiff has to provide a written statement that to the best of his/her knowledge he/she has ”taken all steps solely within his or her power to remove all barriers to the defendant’s remarriage … or that the  defendant  has waived in writing [this requirements]. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
(the “Corporation”), and each of whom also is a 25% member of Catarina Realty, LLC (the “LLC”) which leases its sole realty asset to the Corporation. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
(the “Corporation”), and each of whom also is a 25% member of Catarina Realty, LLC (the “LLC”) which leases its sole realty asset to the Corporation. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:44 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
***It's pretty hard not to read the New York Times and the Washington Post these days, a journalistic battle that illustrates the profound benefits of competition. [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Non-Compete and Trade Secrets News for the week ended May 19, 2017***After two weeks, a lot to catch up on...Abuse of Non-CompetesThe big newspaper story on non-competes came in the Saturday New York Times, which discussed the proliferation of non-compete agreements across a range of industries and job positions. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:13 am by Helen Klein Murillo
As Quinta and I explained: Under United States v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 8:00 am by Josh Blackman
New York, Korematsu is far too often invoked as a judicial bogeyman that privileges passion over persuasion. [read post]