Search for: "State v. Bill"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 19,525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2010, 1:52 pm
The Drug and Device Law Blog has a guest post on the status of the Medical Device Safety Act of 2009, a bill that has been introduced in Congress that would overturn the Supreme Court's holding in Riegel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:29 am
Today's advance release civil procedure law opinion: Benvenuto v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 6:54 am
When the Court decided United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:11 pm
Wadleton v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
The case is The Boeing Company v. [read post]
Will the Republican Rules Package in the House Make Calling a Constitutional Convention More Likely?
9 Jan 2023, 7:06 am
An ELB reader notes this provision buried in the rules bill, that would potentially revive some old state calls for a constitutional convention: PROVIDING FOR TRANSPARENCY WITH RESPECT TO MEMORIALS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE… Continue reading The post Will the Republican Rules Package in the House Make Calling a Constitutional Convention More Likely? [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 8:43 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Wednesday in Luis v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:09 pm
Brown [LII case backgrounder; merit briefs], 06-939, a case where the Court is reviewing the constitutionality of a 2000 California law [Assembly Bill 1889 text] that prohibits employers from using certain funds they receive from the state to influence [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:43 pm
Supply, Inc. v Kemper Cas. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 11:51 am
., P.C. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 6:57 am
In doing so, the Walls v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:10 pm
Duane Morris Takeaways: Last year, the Ninth Circuit held in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 1:52 pm
The Drug and Device Law Blog has a guest post on the status of the Medical Device Safety Act of 2009, a bill that has been introduced in Congress that would overturn the Supreme Court's holding in Riegel v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:55 am
Yesterday's oral arguments in the case of City of Carmel v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 9:53 am
6-30-2009 Ohio:The 11th Appellate Dist court of Ohio has found the changes made by Senate bill 10 (made according to the Adam Walsh Act) unconstitutional in the case of Spangler v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:27 am
I’m working on an article on an interesting search and seizure case, out of the First Circuit, United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 4:05 am
In the case, a Louisiana federal district court held that Louisiana House Bill 71 that requires a copy of the Ten Commandments to be posted in every public-school classroom in the state is facially unconstitutional and unconstitutional in all applications. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:31 am
In 2019, the Kansas Supreme Court ruled in Hodes & Nauser v Schmidt that the Kansas Constitution protects a fundamental right to personal autonomy, which includes the right to decide whether to continue a pregnancy. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s Burwell v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:04 pm
It is well established that this “view” can exist both before and after publication (Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
