Search for: "State v. Mains"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 10,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 1:11 pm
The defense in United States v. al-Nashiri (the next military commission proceeding set to come to trial) has moved for an order (see the second entry under al-Nashiri, # AEO11) obliging the government to declare whether it would continue to hold al-Nashiri in military custody in the event of an acquittal in his military commission proceeding. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
(The 1970s-era standing decision in question is United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:10 am
In Wood v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:17 pm
The decision at issue is Cipollone v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:44 pm
Supreme Court’s 1884 opinion in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Company v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
Solicitor General regarding the matter of Heien v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:27 am
Case citation: Martin v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:26 am
In Williams v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:26 am
In Williams v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:50 pm
"Each state may decide if it wishes to adopt the deferral and proceed accordingly." [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:03 am
The Nez Perce Tribe Law & Order Executive Officer (Manager-V), Lapwai, ID. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:04 pm
California Air Resources Board and Morning Star Packing Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
In LePage v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 1:12 pm
Locke v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:17 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am
Marty Lederman says in response to my posts that the big difference between the Bush and Obama preemption doctrines was that the Bush Administration “argued that international law permits the United States to engage in a ‘first use’ strike, in a nonconsenting state, against a state or nonstate actor that has not already engaged in an armed attack against the United States, before any threat of attack is ‘fully formed’ — indeed,… [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
” Here’s the brief filed in EEOC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:27 am
That is not a defect in Article V, but precisely the way it was supposed to work. [read post]
