Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 4,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2014, 1:24 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 1:58 pm
Cerqueira v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
So far, Microsoft appears to have hoped it could have its cake and eat it: keep imposing similar terms as Apple and Google on XBox game makers while forcing Apple and Google to give Microsoft and others more favorable terms. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
§ 3582(c)), and even though the right to counsel applies to post-sentencing actions that affect time in custody (Mempa v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:01 am
(Title 26 of the United States Code would be a good deal shorter if the unwise tax laws could be purged by the judiciary.) [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:08 am
Take-Two Interactive case currently pending at the New York Court of Appeals.Lindsay Lohan sued in 2014 Take-Two Interactive, the maker of the “Grand Theft Auto V” video game, claiming that it had used her image when creating the character Lacey Jonas, see here and here, and thus violated her right to privacy under New York Civil Rights Law § 51 by misappropriating her likeness.Reality show star Karen Gravano filed a similar suit, claiming that the character… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:15 am
First, discrimination may arise where the state fails to treat differently people whose situations are significantly different. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:08 am
Other granted cases include a test of state power to regulate commercial shipments of tobacco and other products harmful to childrren and a case involving state's authority to allow damage claims against makers of medical devices approved by federal authorities. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
This is the first part of today's little trilogy of FRAND-related posts.In early May, the Antitrust Division of the DOJ, under Qualcomm's former outside counsel and now-Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, filed an amicus brief with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California more than three months after the FTC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 7:30 pm
In Fredericks v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:10 am
Circuit Court of Appeal’s ruling in Brown v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:26 pm
(Lopez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:37 pm
Here, the platform makers can just leverage the market power of their platforms. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:59 am
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted on the two questions stated above. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:50 am
The Supreme Court is expected to hear the case of Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:06 am
In SEC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 10:30 am
However, the PSED consequences of enforcing an order ought already to have been adequately considered by the decision maker before the order is sought and, in most cases, in the absence of any material change in circumstances (which circumstances may include the decision maker’s state of knowledge of the disability), the continuing nature of the duty will not mandate further explicit reconsideration. [read post]
