Search for: "State v. Still"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 44,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm
Still it would be a hardy theatregoer who would want to take it in twice in a row, or even twice in a decade. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm
Still it would be a hardy theatregoer who would want to take it in twice in a row, or even twice in a decade. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:24 am
Humanitarian Law Project, No. 08-1498, and Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm
However, review of the constitutionality of New York's Persistent Felony Offender sentencing law is still being sought in the certiorari petition filed on March 10, 2011 in the direct appeal in People v Battles [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:26 pm
Still plenty of time to meet the deadline. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:50 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 9:32 pm
And the governor, under his interpretation of federal labor law and the state Supreme Court's decision in White v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:09 am
Still other states, or citizens within those states, took action to amend their state constitutions to either protect or eliminate the right. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:59 am
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:19 pm
As shown by Mitchell v. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 6:01 am
A divided court held that President Harry Truman could still take actions under the act shortly after World War II after it had been invoked against a German national, deferring to the political branches regarding whether a state of war between the United States and Germany still existed. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:25 am
Qualcomm opinion, and even though the Supreme Court held the Apple v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
Groch v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:24 pm
Earlier this week, in Chavarria v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
Notwithstanding this elucidation by the Court, the passage still does little to clarify what would constitute an “overwhelming supervening act”. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 10:52 am
Filburn and Katzenbach v. [read post]
