Search for: "State v. Still" Results 1381 - 1400 of 44,526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2024, 8:23 am by Eric Goldman
Google Selected Posts About State Action Claims YouTube Still Isn’t a State Actor–Albertson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
Published reports citing court filings stated that company executives met with the mediator in a full-day session, followed by a number of phone calls, without success. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:24 am by Paul Venard
Humanitarian Law Project, No. 08-1498, and Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm by Buce
 Still it would be a hardy theatregoer who would want to take it in twice in a row, or even twice in a decade. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm by Buce
 Still it would be a hardy theatregoer who would want to take it in twice in a row, or even twice in a decade. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am by John Elwood
Van Dyke dissented, arguing that his colleagues had “pull[ed] the plug on a case that – even now – still has some life in it” and that if they had reached the merits, Washington state’s map was indeed a racial gerrymander that “cannot survive strict scrutiny. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 6:01 am by Scott Bomboy
A divided court held that President Harry Truman could still take actions under the act shortly after World War II after it had been invoked against a German national, deferring to the political branches regarding whether a state of war between the United States and Germany still existed. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
However, review of the constitutionality of New York's Persistent Felony Offender sentencing law is still being sought in the certiorari petition filed on March 10, 2011 in the direct appeal in People v Battles [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 9:32 pm
And the governor, under his interpretation of federal labor law and the state Supreme Court's decision in White v. [read post]
Notwithstanding this elucidation by the Court, the passage still does little to clarify what would constitute an “overwhelming supervening act”. [read post]