Search for: "State v. Taylor "
Results 1381 - 1400
of 3,341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2016, 7:19 am
According to the SEC website, the following are xamples of SEC enforcement actions against Ponzi schemes: 2014 · Neal V. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Taylor, 782 F.3d 1142 (10th Cir. 2015); In re Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:18 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
Bunn v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Taylor v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:19 am
In his 1995 decision for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 3:06 am
The Taylor case is the jewel in the crown of the SCSL, as it was the first ever trial and conviction of a former African head of state for crimes committed in a neighboring state. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
In State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
In State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
(PBA) provided that police officers subject to discipline by the Town had the right to a hearing before a neutral arbitrator, in 2007 the Town adopted Local Law No. 2, which sets forth disciplinary procedures for police officers different than those set out in the CBA.The Court explained that notwithstanding “the strong and sweeping policy of the State to support collective bargaining under the Taylor Law," police discipline may not be a subject of collective bargaining… [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Appellate Division holds Civil Service Law Article 14 trumps Second Class Cities Law Article 9 with respect to negotiating police disciplinary proceduresCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Restoration of leave credits used by employees electing to remain on the payroll while on Workers’ Compensation Leave pursuant to Civil Service Law §71Galuski v New York State Div. of Military & Nav. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
John Taylor v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:58 am
In Coble v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:58 am
In Coble v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:58 am
In Coble v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:00 am
In giving the lead judgment, Lord Sumption stated that s 12A of the Theft Act imposes strict liability only to the extent that anyone who was party to the taking of the vehicle (and in the immediate vicinity at the time of the injury) commits the offence, whether or not he was driving at the time. [read post]
