Search for: "United States v. Englander"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 2,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:54 am
In addition to the SSI fraud alleged, the Massachusetts woman is also alleged to have defrauded the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or what people used to be called food stamps program administered by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 3:32 pm
Seyfarth Shaw Seyfarth Shaw Cancels 2010 Summer Program Seyfarth Shaw: Salary Cuts and Deferral Extensions, Oh My Nationwide Layoff Watch: Seyfarth Shaw Cuts 50, Cuts Salaries, Cuts Back on Summer Program Lancaster - England - United States - Lancashire - K&L Gates [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
Inspired by the notion, described in this recent post, that no reasonable consumer in the United States might regard a product branded 'vitaminwater' as being a healthy beverage, several of the Kats' correspondents have been sending him amusing items from their own jurisdictions which reflect upon things that reasonable consumers might not consider. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
A decision by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit late last month concerning Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), in Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm
In his 1787 Defense of the Constitutions of the United States he elaborates on this point: “If in England there has ever been such a thing as a government of laws, was it not magna charta? [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am
Drumroll, please…… Professor Nadine Strossen chose West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
With England’s (somewhat surprisingly!) [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:57 pm
The Supreme Court held in Cotton Corporation of India v United Industrial Bank AIR 1983 SC 1272:"[I]gnoring all the relevant considerations, one cannot bodily import English decisions in our system to develop a hybrid legal system and one cannot be so hypnotised by English decisions to overlook legislative changes introduced in Indian Law. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:48 am
– Kirsten Sjøvoll Facebook’s Community Standards: Severed heads are okay, but nipples are bad (unless accompanied by a baby) – Gideon Benaim and Jon Oakley United States: Facebook, Cyberbullying and the First Amendment – Susan Brenner So, welcome back to our readers. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
New England Technology, Inc. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
New England Technology, Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Department of Homeland Security can deport individuals while it evaluates their applications for asylum in the United States from Mexico. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:04 pm
By embracing both Wong Kim Ark and Elk v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 10:56 pm
A sign of how parlous the state of funding is within local authorities these days. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The big factors were (1) the case involves a claim for a tort committed in England; (2) that claim was probably governed by English law; (3) the passing off evidence would focus on consumers in England; (4) the governing law for the contract claims is state of Pennsylvania. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
Furthermore, it was held in Davis v United States (8th Cir. 1917) that a public trial is broadly defined as a trial at which the public is free to attend. [read post]
