Search for: "United States v. Small"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 7,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2018, 2:09 pm
United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:39 pm
The United States filed an amicus brief in the Court of Appeals in the case, Jesus Christ is the Answer Ministries, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
John Roberts is sworn in as the 17th Chief Justice of the United States under President George W. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:38 am
United States, No. 12-173C (Nov. 27, 2012). [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:24 am
United States, No. 18-1595C (2019) involved an Army solicitation for a multi-billion dollar multiple-award IDIQ. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
In National Small Business United v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 9:46 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
In today's decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:31 am
Not every day does the United States Supreme Court weigh in on a topic impacting the trademark world, but it did so yesterday in Already, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:04 am
Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused registration of “Trump Too Small” under Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act (15 USC 1052(c)) because the phrase includes a living individual’s name without his written consent. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:35 am
Two weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court decided to hear another patent case[1] – marking only the ninth time during the Chief Justice Roberts era that Court has decided to do so. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
" United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:53 pm
For instance, in an Ericsson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:28 am
In Werdebaugh v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:45 am
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine that the plaintiffs lack a legal right to challenge the FDA’s actions regarding the regulation of mifepristone, the drug used in over half of abortion in the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:49 am
–NetChoice v. [read post]
