Search for: "United States v. State of Tex."
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2021, 6:04 am
It is in the national economic (and also the national security) interest of the United States to encourage manufacturing companies to invest. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:16 am
It is true even if the past incidents happened outside of Texas’ state line. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 7:11 am
’” Id. at 7 (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 7:11 am
’” Id. at 7 (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 7:11 am
’” Id. at 7 (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:04 pm
Tex. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:44 am
These were apparently lump sum licenses, but included “whereas” clauses stating that EcoFactor believed that the lump-sum payments were based upon this $X per-unit royalty rate. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 2:09 pm
Brown, 929 S.W.2d 588 (Tex. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
United States (Case No. 11-318 (Court of Claims)). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
United States (Case No. 11-318 (Court of Claims)). [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
July 2, 2009). http://kuex.us/71aa Doc Retention and Destruction: United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
United States, 409 U.S. 322, 328 (1973). [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
[United States] : [Distributed by] PBS, c2010. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Use of the drug took place in a military context: everyone in the decedent’s unit took an antimalarial drug before shipping to Afghanistan. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:55 pm
Meanwhile, the United States has filed a cert. petition in Garland v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:07 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
