Search for: "Antitrust Today"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 3,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
And near the end, the discussion at today’s oral argument related to what it takes to try a class case, whether in arbitration or not, due to the cost of proving violations of complex antitrust statutes and damages to boot. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:31 am
The case arises out of the antitrust laws. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:32 pm
Linda Greenhouse reports here in today's New York Times on the Court's decision in Brendlin v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 11:31 pm
And what was missing last term has returned: environmental cases -- significantly, four very different ones -- and an antitrust challenge. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:31 pm
The Competition Bureau, however, was reported by the Montreal Gazette and others today to have repeated its concerns about the proposed transaction: “A spokeswoman for the federal antitrust watchdog said there were no new developments to report regarding its continuing review of the proposed deal. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:56 am
: NFL players and owners are expected to vote today and tomorrow on a 10-year labor contract that would allow the season to start on time, ending a months long lockout amid antitrust litigation, The New York Times reports. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:08 am
In a week from today, Microsoft and the plaintiffs will propose a schedule (they may or may not agree on the same filing deadlines) further to a recent court order. [read post]
Bipartisan group of Congressmen stresses SEP concerns in letter to ITC ahead of Samsung-Apple ruling
22 May 2013, 12:23 pm
Today a letter from the leaders (chairmen and ranking members) of the intellectual property and antitrust subcomittees of the House of Representatives, which is dated May 10, 2013, entered the electronic document system of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC). [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:14 am
The antitrust committee has not made a decision about whether to proceed with an investigation, the sources said, and it was not clear when a decision might be made. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:21 am
Please join us for this Progress & Freedom Foundation luncheon briefing today at 12-2 pm in the Capitol Visitor Center, Room SVC 208/209 at E Capitol St NE & 1st St NE. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:16 pm
The parties countered with both antitrust arguments and constitutional challenges to the FTC’s structure and procedures, much as other parties like Illumina have. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 9:57 am
Howe Institute published a new competition/antitrust related report today entitled “Closing the Back Door Route to Cartels: The Need to Clarify the Regulated Conduct Doctrine” that calls for the Competition Bureau to clarify how the regulated conduct defence applies and how the Bureau may act as an advocate of competition in regulated sectors. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 8:31 pm
Ed Richards, Chief Executive of Ofcom, was at Columbia today. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:06 pm
The FTC announced today a notice of proposed rulemaking (“NPRM”)[1] proposing extensive revisions to both the rules that implement the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (the “Act” or “HSR Act”), and the Premerger Notification and Report Form (the “Form”) that merging parties must submit under the Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 10:06 am
The FTC announced today a notice of proposed rulemaking (“NPRM”)[1] proposing extensive revisions to both the rules that implement the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (the “Act” or “HSR Act”), and the Premerger Notification and Report Form (the “Form”) that merging parties must submit under the Act. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:34 pm
The CAFA Law Blog is pleased to publish a post by a guest columnist today. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm
While we are not antitrust scholars, we do teach and right in the area of the First Amendment, and in our view, under current Supreme Court doctrine, law firms that stood together to resist the administration would be insulated from antitrust liability.At the outset, we concede a few points that might otherwise create the worrisome prospect of an antitrust violation. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 6:56 am
Please contact us today online, at 973-781-1204, or at 646-867-7997 to schedule a confidential consultation to see how we can help you. [read post]
29 May 2024, 10:30 am
Yet, such cases and certainly such plaintiff verdicts are rare today. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:46 am
According to that June 30 report, "U.S. antitrust regulators have agreed the FTC will focus on Motorola Mobility and the Justice Department will scrutinize Samsung Electronics Co.' [read post]
