Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 30,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2025, 5:13 am
In the case of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:27 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 6:17 pm
Gross v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 6:03 am
Keehn v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:01 am
; Churchland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:19 am
Updating some of my blogs this morning to include citations to Southeastern Reporter and South Carolina Reports, I realized that the petition for rehearing in Stone v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:49 pm
DC Arena, L.P. (17 F.3d 579) imposes an improper burden on agency rulemaking)Contract/NoncompeteDavid v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:30 am
In Hope in the City, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 1:10 pm
Byrd v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:03 am
In the Enron prosecution, the defendant failed to meet his burden to show "that the government was responsible for the unavailability of the declarants"; Fifth Circuit also notes an issue of "first impression": "whether, to invoke Rule 804(b)(6) properly, a party must make this evidentiary showing with material independent of the hearsay itself," in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 1:10 pm
While ultimately holding that denial of a crystal, a worship spot and a fire pit to a prisoner did not place a substantial burden on his practice of Odinism, in Smith v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 4:30 am
APPEALUnited States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:18 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:23 pm
I mentioned yesterday that I understood CAAF had granted review in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 4:26 am
The Court in Meyer v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
In a lengthy opinion, a New York federal district court in Fortress Bible Church v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 9:17 am
State barred from initiating or enacting legislation authorizing the furloughing of State workersDonohue et al v Paterson, USDC, Northern District of New York, 1:10-CV-00543 (LEK/DRH) [Filed May 28,2010]Federal District Court Judge Lawrence E. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:01 am
Eighth Circuit concludes the names of the prior convictions (for possession of crack cocaine and as a felon in possession of a firearm) were relevant to show the prior felonies qualified under the statute and were marginally prejudicial since the jury could learn there was more than one felony and given the burden of the government to show the nature of the felony, in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:24 am
Mewengkang v. [read post]
