Search for: "COOPER v. LONG" Results 1401 - 1420 of 3,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2020, 10:25 am by Cleve Clinton
Related Blogs: COVID-19 v. the Constitution: The Conflict Continues [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
He is not able to make long, sustained notes. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 6:17 pm by Robert Chesney
This marked the culmination of a long process of CFIUS review of ByteDance’s earlier acquisition of the Musical.ly app, which the company later rebranded as TikTok. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
Cooper-Ponte discusses it in more depth on her piece on derogations. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:58 am by Victoria Clark
Harry Graver summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Ortiz v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
What a shame that it has taken so long to reach this point, adds Merpel, who hopes that this decision will not be subject to a further appeal. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
TysonIn a Bad State is an incredibly important contribution to the literature on state and local government fiscal matters and a much broader discussion of cooperative federalism. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
“To foster long-term financial success, it is essential to address the climate-oriented investment challenges faced by the Fund’s portfolio. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
“To foster long-term financial success, it is essential to address the climate-oriented investment challenges faced by the Fund’s portfolio. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm by Series of Essays
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
[No petition for review filed].Blake Cooper, a Reno County public defender, won in State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by John Elwood
Before proceeding to phone it in flagrantly, let me pause just long enough to note that with the Supreme Court putting partisan-gerrymander case Gill v. [read post]