Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 32,286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2017, 5:37 am
Here is the reasoning:We hold that the NLRB was correct in deciding that an employer violates Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:49 am
§ 103(a) as obvious over Duerig and Burgermeister.We affirm the rejection of claims 8 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:59 am
Here is how we think the analysis ought to play out:(1) What exactly is the alleged violation of federal law? [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
The decision also does not formulate the technical problem in accordance with T 641/00 [catchword 2] which, if any, the claimed invention is considered to solve, nor argues why it does not consider that the preamble of claim 1 (“how many wells to drill in a plurality of oil and gas field assets”) constitutes this technical problem as the applicant proposed […]. [4] With reference to T 1227/05 the ED only argues […] that “the specific purpose… [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
The next day, an agreement was made and to meet at the same place for the purchase of 1/8 of a kilo. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:07 am
Claims 2-8 fall with claim 1. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:25 pm
Dan Balz poses the questions:1) Will a Sweep by Obama Make Him the Front-Runner?... [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:16 am
Drivers are using their cellphones during 58% of trips taken, an 8% increase from just 3 years ago. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
How does one fairly rank world universities? [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 2:00 pm
The second-overall pick simply does not want to make mistakes, which is good news for Eagles fans—and bad news for everyone else on the list. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:17 am
Patent No. 6,319,006 (claims 1-8 obvious over two prior art references; claims 9-10 patentable). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
On January 11 of this year, the United States Supreme Court, in an 8-1 decision, ruled that in a chapter 13 bankruptcy a debtor was not entitled to the vehicle ownership expense deduction since the debtor did not make any loan or lease payments for the vehicle (see Ransom v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:09 pm
Information available at this time does not indicate an ongoing risk of acquiring hepatitis A virus infection at Tropical Smoothie Café’s, as the contaminated food product has been removed as of August 8. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., June 1, 2018, Bouchard, A.). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
Failure to meet the new requirements in provisional refusals If a national trade mark office does not indicate the start and end dates or does not comply with the minimum time limit to react to a provisional refusal, WIPO will not accept the provisional refusal and inform both the national trade mark office and the IR holder of this fact (‘defective notice’, Rule 18(1)(d) Regulations). [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 7:13 am
U.S., 124 AFTR 2d 2019-XXXX (DC MN) (8/6/2019)Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 7:53 am
By: Ben Barlow [8/10/22] Cannabis legalization advocates are quick to point out a Catch-22 in current legalization debates. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:04 pm
Caniglia, 1 Neb. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 11:04 am
CGB Enterprises, Inc., No. 113836 -- (1) Does the Federal Food Security Act of 1985, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
