Search for: "Doe v. City of New York" Results 1401 - 1420 of 5,426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Name clearing hearingsChang v Department of Educ. of the City of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 02018, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Department of Education [Department] terminated Tzefang Frances Chang’s contract as a bilingual speech pathologist. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the Appellate Division held that the Plaintiff's breach of contract claims against the New York City Department of Education [DOE] was properly dismissed for failure to serve a notice of claim within three months of claim accrual, citing Fifty CPW Tenants Corp. v Epstein, 16 AD3d 292, the court further observed that these breach of contract claims against DOE were all related to Plaintiff's termination. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the Appellate Division held that the Plaintiff's breach of contract claims against the New York City Department of Education [DOE] was properly dismissed for failure to serve a notice of claim within three months of claim accrual, citing Fifty CPW Tenants Corp. v Epstein, 16 AD3d 292, the court further observed that these breach of contract claims against DOE were all related to Plaintiff's termination. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, the Court of Appeals, quoting Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, said that "To promote open government and public accountability, FOIL* imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, the Court of Appeals, quoting Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, said that "To promote open government and public accountability, FOIL* imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:27 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
That question was considered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York last year. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
That question was considered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York last year. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
If you sue municipalities for a living, you are aware of the Notice of Claim requirements in New York. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:51 pm by John Diekman
City of New York, NY Slip Op 09174 (1st Dept. 2011).Here is the decision.Tomorrow’s issue: Expert testimony. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:00 am by David Cole
 In a recent New York Book of Review essay, ACLU National Legal Director David Cole outlines the argument. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:02 am
In addition to his employment by MTA, Grate also worked for the New York City Department of Sanitation. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 32 NY3d 556The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02875.htm [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 32 NY3d 556The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02875.htm [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Dated: Bronx, New York January 13, 2011 _______________________________ MIRIAM R. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Further, said the court, “The penalty of termination does not shock our sense of fairness,” citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32.The Appellate Division also considered the fact that “one of the two main witnesses relied upon by the hearing officer in reaching his conclusion had recanted his testimony” some two years later.The Commissioner, however, had denied Officer’s request for a new hearing based on “this new evidence. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
The Complaint does cite at length Candidate Trump’s campaign rhetoric characterizing San Francisco as a sanctuary city—in an attempt to explain San Francisco’s fear that the new Administration will read section 1373 broadly, but these campaign statements are of limited relevance insofar as Mr. [read post]