Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 12,901
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2017, 6:31 am
So what does this mean for employers submitting EEO-1 Reports? [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 3:39 pm
Inattention while driving can mean someone’s family member does not return home. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 11:10 pm
Oral proceedings were held on 29 January 2020 in the absence of the respondent. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
If G 1/18 is applicable, but the case is not stayed as the outcome on the merits of the appeal does not change, can a decision on the reimbursement/refund be made without staying in view of the relevance of G 1/18 on that decision (esp. as refund is not at the discretion of the EPO/Board)? [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
Does getting the local media involved help a client? [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 3:37 am
., Cancellation No. 92057088 (June 29, 2015) [precedential].Although the proceeding was couched in terms of priority and likelihood of confusion under Section 2(a), the crux of the dispute was the issue of ownership. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 4:48 am
The decision does not elaborate as to what these serious reasons may constitute. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
McDonald's is (or, rather, was) the owner of the word mark 'BIG MAC' for the following goods and services in Classes 29, 30 and 42 of the Nice Classification:Supermac filed an application under Article 58(1)(a) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation, requesting the revocation - in its entirety - of 'BIG MAC', on grounds that the mark would have not been put to genuine use for a continuous period of 5 years.In response to the application, McDonald's submitted… [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 11:04 am
Sept. 29, 2015) (“Final Decision”); Cerro Wire, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 9:15 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:00 am
BVG responded and argued: 1. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:07 am
On November 29, 2016, the Judicial Reforms Subcommittee approved Congress House Bill No. 1 (Death Penalty Law), which would reinstate capital punishment for “heinous crimes,” including murder, piracy, and the trafficking and possession of illegal drugs. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
See SEC Comment Letter, Carlyle S-1, 2012; see also Carlyle S-1, 2012. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm
Lexis 1688, at *26-29. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:23 am
Kingdom Trust Company; PENSCO Trust Company; John Does 1-25, 2017-1336. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 7:54 am
The California Supreme Court considered these and other scenarios during an hour-long oral argument on September 29, as it asked, What does it mean to not “work” during a rest break? [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:17 am
HARRISBURG, Dec. 29 – A U.S. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:30 am
Therefore, the date that laches began to run was October 29, 2012. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:16 am
Cir. 2016) (remanding forfailure to articulate a motivation to combine).To be clear, the Board’s error here does not stem fromits disregard for the teachings of any particular reference.As Tire Hanger correctly observes, the law does notrequire that the Board address every conceivable combinationof prior art discussed throughout an IPR proceeding,no matter how duplicative the other references are.Appellee’s Br. 29–30. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:47 am
See 29 U.S.C. [read post]
