Search for: "Ely Lilly" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2016, 6:12 am
. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:17 am by Brian A. Comer
The drug maker is challenging a Spartanburg County jury's 2011 decision that Janssen broke the law by writing to thousands of South Carolina doctors, downplaying the links between diabetes and its schizophrenia drug Risperdal, and by improperly claiming the drug was safer than competing medications, like Eli Lilly & Co.' [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:29 am
The SPC Blog carries a hot-off-the-press piece from victorious law firm Powell Gilbert following judgment in Eli Lilly v Human Genome Science. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 12:13 am
He gave the example of Eli Lilly which tried to develop a cure against Alzheimer’s disease, invested over a US$ billion and spent ten years in R&D to no avail. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:10 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reg.48697–48698.This inconsistency had been an argument for those supporting the Cuozzo position; Reuters noted:Cuozzo was supported by several industry groups and companies, which urged the justices to take the case.One friend-of-the-court brief filed in the case on behalf of 3M Co, Caterpillar Inc, Eli Lilly and Co and Qualcomm Inc said the patent office reviews and litigation in district court needed to be streamlined for the "proper functioning of the patent system… [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:47 pm by Bexis
Eli Lilly & Co., 2012 WL 1893551, at *3 (D. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
 Finally, there was an analysis of the recent decision of the District Court of The Hague that the Dutch part of Eli Lilly and Company's patent EP 1 313 508 is valid. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
UK Supreme Court moves towards a UK Doctrine of Equivalents in Lilly pemetrexed battle? [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
”Even here, however, we see signs that UK courts are trying to be more consistent with the EPO, and in the HGS v Lilly litigation, reading the decision of the Supreme Court in Human Genome Sciences Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 (see IPKat here) it is possible discern in the judgment a desire to not only apply the jurisprudence of the EPO Boards of Appeal, but also to reach the same conclusion (of sufficiency of the claims) on the specific facts of… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Although this claim was not considered on its merits because it was time barred, the court (in preliminary proceedings) accepted that patent assignments may “unduly” lessen competition where “the assignment increases the assignees' market power in excess of that inherent in the patent rights assigned” (Eli Lilly v Apotex 2009 FC 991 at para. 750, 881, aff’d 2010 FCA 240; see also Apotex v Eli Lilly 2005 FCA 361). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:31 am by Marie Louise
: Cour d’Appel Paris decision in Teva v Eli Lilly (Kluwer Patent Blog) US: CAFC confirms that isolated DNA may be patented: Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]