Search for: "Fanning v. Fanning" Results 1401 - 1420 of 4,468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2016, 7:42 am by Ben
 The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Official description: Infringement monitoring tools and services; automated sending of notices, including notice parameters; automated processing of notices; role of human review; identification of works through fingerprinting, hash identifiers, and other technologies; filtering, including “staydown” capabilities; fair use considerations; identification and tracking of repeat infringers; and other pertinent issues. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s where the imbalance comes: relatively manageable cost of doing business v. creation side is being killed by piracy and dealing w/great burdens from §512 to little effect. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 JC: give us more of flavor of how much of your takedown effort is automated v. human and what interaction is? [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am by Andres
Occasionally there are cases that seem to be tailor-made for legal geeks: Naruto v Slater; Lucasfilm v Ainsworth; DC Comics v Towle. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:37 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Beverly Hills Fan,21 F.3d at 1565; see also Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v.Mylan Pharm. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:45 pm
Being a sports fan and a tax lawyer, the opinion sparked my interest. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:45 pm
Being a sports fan and a tax lawyer, the opinion sparked my interest. [read post]