Search for: "GORDON v GORDON" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,592
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2013, 4:44 am by Broc Romanek
Symantec Wins Dismissal in Say-on-Pay Litigation 2.0 Here's an excerpt from Latham's Jim Barrall's news over on "The Conference Board Blog": In a very important development in the current proxy disclosure litigation wars relating to annual meeting votes, last Thursday the Santa Clara County Superior Court sustained Symantec Corporation's demurrer in Natalie Gordon vs. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 7:49 am by emagraken
In support of this position the claimant relies upon the case of Gordon v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:01 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Since the Town of Chester and the Planning Board of the Town of Blooming Grove, as co-lead agencies of the Mountco project, had already issued a positive declaration, the County was prohibited from issuing a subsequent determination (see 6 NYCRR 617.6[b][3][iii]; Matter of Gordon v Rush, 299 AD2d 20, 29, affd 100 NY2d 236; Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Poquott v Cahill, 11 AD3d 536, 542)." [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
David Gaukrodger (OECD) & Kathryn Gordon (OECD) have posted Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A Scoping Paper for the Investment Policy Community. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1992) (citing In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:04 am
Supreme Court ruling that leaves him on the hook for costs and a dismissed class action over the propriety of phone companies’ system-access fees for cellular service.In Drover v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 8:21 am by Dan Pinnington
An important case on the scope of the duty to avoid conflicts of interest, Canadian National Railway v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Meanwhile, the Sun’s recent apologies to the former prime minister Gordon Brown are documented at the Tabloid Watch and Zelo Street blogs. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:37 pm
McKercher LLP.The rule came about as a result of the top court’s landmark 2002 decision in R v. [read post]