Search for: "Ginsburg v. United States" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2017, 8:50 am by Kevin Johnson
Arguing for the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler again defended the constitutionality of Section 16(b), as he had in January. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:42 pm
Carlisle: The United States Supreme Court Says that Non-Signatories Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements Whenever State Law Would Permit them to Enforce Contracts Generally, Philip J. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Religion has won a number of victories recently at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:08 am by Kedar Bhatia
United States). 92% of paid petitions that were granted and scheduled for argument during OT10 appeared on our “Petitions to Watch” list (61 out of 66). [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:49 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Justice Anthony Kennedy Today, Kennedy is frequently viewed as the Court’s swing vote on social issues and has consequently held special prominence in several politically-charged, highly anticipated 5 to 4 decisions, including the notorious Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:49 am by Edith Roberts
United States and United States v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:00 pm
But even on the bench, Ginsburg has embraced gender as a source of diversity, and her opinions have challenged male judges for embracing gender-based stereotypes.In United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:53 am by Conor McEvily
”  In an op-ed for the Christian Science Monitor Arjun Sethi discusses United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Una pluralidad de cuatro (4) jueces – Gorsuch, Ginsburg, Breyer y Sotomayor – firmaron las partes II(B), IV(B) y V, y una pluralidad de tres (3) jueces con Ginsburg y Breyer para la sección IV(A) de la opinión. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Before the United States's time expired, Justice Ginsburg asked what the Solicitor General made of the qualified expert testimony in the record which asserted that the patent was not obvious. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 11:34 am
He referred to the United States' jury-trial right, one that the Court, reversing precedent, held to be fundamental in Duncan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am by John Elwood
Gunn, 10-1004, which involves a question of personal jurisdiction over the foreign producer of an allegedly defective motorcycle tire sold in the United States, is a likely hold for J. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:52 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Among other arguments, they urged the Court not to consider developments in campaign finance since the Court’s 2010 ruling that is centrally at issue: Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
United States, one of the court’s many immigration cases this term. [read post]