Search for: "Holme v. Holme"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:28 pm
Six long years had passed since the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:33 am
[v]6. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:00 am
This sort of mix-up was the subject of the Chicago personal injury case of Eva Holmes White v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:23 am
Sport of Kings suits (28%) (big co v. big co) [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
On Tuesday 1 November Lords Hale, Kerr and Wilson will hear Joseph Lennox Holmes v Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
Would Supreme Court’s Lear v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
Would Supreme Court’s Lear v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 11:05 am
See Southeast Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
Ali v Birmingham CC.The Court of Appeal gave these arguments short shrift. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
Ali v Birmingham CC.The Court of Appeal gave these arguments short shrift. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Behrend, et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:08 am
(I have no one in particular in mind here, but, by way of example, in recent years a number of people seem to have argued both sides of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
Do you remember the famous Sherlock Holmes mystery in which the most significant fact, in Holmes's view after explaining how he solved the case, was the dog that did not bark? [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:45 pm
Eisner, 256 U.S. 345, 349 (1921) (Holmes, J.)). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
Eisner, 256 U.S. 345, 349 (1921) (Holmes, J.)).Of the four-factor inquiry:Over the [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:08 am
In Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:20 am
In last week’s case (Fiorda v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:04 am
" KIVITV reports that: United States v. [read post]
