Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2013, 5:12 am
Code § 2252(a)(4)(b) and “four counts of distribution of child pornography” in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
SoutherlandIssue: (1) Whether, assuming arguendo that a plaintiff can state a cognizable constitutional claim under either the Fourth or Fourteenth Amendment with respect to a child’s removal, the qualified immunity question as to a caseworker who removed a child in an investigation mandated by New York Social Services Law § 424 should be whether a reasonable jury could conclude that the child was not at imminent risk of harm or whether a reasonable caseworker… [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:45 pm
” Furthermore, that “[b]oth Mary and Joan are excellent parents. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 6:31 am
In this circumstance, the natural guardian of the child will have to assist the child. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
Lacey, Heather D. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Both the Federal Constitutional Court and the ECHR, in turn, rejected PETA-D’s claim, finding that the plaintiffs who had sought the injunction against PETA-D had successfully satisfied part (b) of Article 10, which allows the government to place some limits on free expression, to protect, for example, “the reputation or rights of others. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Full report: Bailii.Re B (Placement For Adoption: Grandmother’s Objection) [2012] EWCA (9 November 2012)Care proceedings. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 10:30 pm
N.J.S.A. 9:17-43(b), 48(d).In D.W. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 9:13 am
A child should never be the delivery person for support payments or other communication between the parents. d). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 9:13 am
A child should never be the delivery person for support payments or other communication between the parents. d). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 9:04 am
Driggins does get a little bit of mileage with a 404(B) argument. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
Hunter, Lewis B. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:31 am
The ECtHR decision in D v Ireland is more interesting on this point. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Food and Drug Admin., Case No. 1:12-cv-01105-ABJ (D. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 6:41 pm
The University of Western Ontario clearly articulates that the s. 2(b) of the Charter does not apply when there are threats or defamation of character. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 8:30 am
Timothy B. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 5:54 am
In clarifying a similar one-half (1/2) support requirement to the four (4) part test above, § 152(d)(5)(B) clearly states that “in the case of remarriage of a parent, support of a child received from the parent’s spouse shall be treated as received from the parent. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
Not a grant but, statistically speaking, the next best thing: the Court CVSG’d in the once-relisted Mount Holly v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:44 am
The other could prove interesting. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 12:33 pm
Their adjusters are trained in how to trick you into saying things that can be used against you. 9) Hire an attorney to represent your interests immediately if any of the following is true: a) Liability is disputed in any way or contributing factors are placed upon you in the police report, b) You have any injuries that require medical care, c) You are… [read post]
