Search for: "In Re IT Group, Inc., Co."
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2010, 5:39 am
The case is In re Grand Jury Subpoena (ABC, Inc.), 668 F.Supp.2d 307 (U.S. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 10:25 am
BOC Group Inc., No. 1:04-CV-18948, 2008 WL 2796726 (N.D.Ohio July 18, 2008)(denying Rule 702 challenge to treating physician’s causation opinion), rev’d sub nom. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 12:09 am
The commission said Hall's "inability to exercise self-restraint ... convinces us there is a strong likelihood she will re-offend. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:50 am
Morel (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Google – Google asks California judge to declare that it is not liable for copyright infringement, simply by linking to copyright-infringing works on RapidShare (1709 Copyright Blog) Universal Music Group – Amici urge 9th Circuit to reverse UMG v Veoh case; RIAA, NBCU, PROs and WLF weigh in (Copyrights & Campaigns) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court E D Virginia dismisses Rosetta Stone’s… [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 3:42 pm
In the course of its analysis, the Court discussed the recent decision of In Re: MONY Group, Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Groupe CRH Canada inc. c. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), and – depending on the allegation – maybe implied preemption under Buckman Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:01 am
Editor’s Note: Charles Nathan is Of Counsel at Latham & Watkins LLP and is co-chair of the firm’s Corporate Governance Task Force. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
But L-1, which should be simpler to obtain,” said Chen Amit, co-founder and CEO of Tipalti, a San Mateo, Calif. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
Roche Laboratories, Inc., 243 F. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
That may be because with this decision and earlier decisions in Marchand and In re Boeing Co. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
Justices Middleton, Jagot and Moshinsky identified three errors of principle in Justice Perram’s evaluation of ‘strong reasons’, enabling them to re-evaluate whether strong reasons existed. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
In NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 8:42 am
Neo@Ogilvy LLC, WPP Group USA, Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 11:55 am
A number of recent events make it particularly likely that employees will benefit from re-evaluating their W-4 withholding now. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
In In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. [read post]
