Search for: "In re B. G." Results 1401 - 1420 of 3,679
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by INFORRM
A third is a recognition that, as the … [Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights] put it in Hrico v Slovakia 49418/99 (2005) 41 EHRR 18, [2004] ECHR 365 (20 July 2004) [40](g) “There is little scope under Article 10(2) of the Convention for restrictions on … questions of public interest …”. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:46 pm by Jim Gerl
 See also,  Memo to Chief Sch Officers Re Dispute Resolution Procedures Under Part B of IDEA 61 IDELR. 232 (OSEP 7/23/13) (Q and A document with a section on state complaints.)------- Thanks for subscribing! [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
For example, in In re Morgan, Pryor wrote an opinion holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
And, you are a terrible employee because a, b, c, d, e, f, g, …. qqq, sss…” However, Do have business reason to end someone’s employment; Document the reason(s); and If there is one reason, share it; or If there are many reasons, share some (“We’re ending your employment. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
And, you are a terrible employee because a, b, c, d, e, f, g, …. qqq, sss…” However, Do have business reason to end someone’s employment; Document the reason(s); and If there is one reason, share it; or If there are many reasons, share some (“We’re ending your employment. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm by nedaj
Annual Re-Certification of CFTC Exemptions. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
(g) The evidence was clearly presented and easy to follow (albeit 15 pages long). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:26 am by David Cosgrove
If the person is seeking admission or re-admission to the industry; and1. the person is subject to an order under Exchange Act Section 15(b)(4)(H)(i), then the person must file an application unless the order imposing a bar on the person is time-limited and the time period is expired. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:38 am by Ron Coleman
[But b]eing paid to express an opinion is not so different from being affected by one’s likelihood of getting tenure, a promotion or a choice committee assignment. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
You're not allowed to let your neighbor use your e-mail, your wife use your e-mail, because there's constant e-mailings from the school about students. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Texas Disciplinary Rule of Professional Conduct 5.08 provides: (a) A lawyer shall not willfully, in connection with an adjudicatory proceeding, except as provided in paragraph (b), manifest, by words or conduct, bias or prejudice based on race, color, national origin, religion, di [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Dans un tel contexte, l’application des tests prévus dans les dispositions générales relatives à l’appel (art. [read post]