Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 1401 - 1420
of 13,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2017, 4:44 pm
See, e.g., LG Elecs. [read post]
26 May 2014, 12:00 am
[Though there is a debate (e.g. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:07 am
See, e.g., Mintz v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
’” (quoting In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, 209 F.R.D. 251, 262 (D.D.C. 2002)). [2] See, e.g., Wachtel ex rel. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
. 'They’re getting everything as freebies,' Mr. [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:11 pm
E.g., Majority Op. 11−14. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 4:05 am
In re Deutscher Fußball-Bund (DFB) e.V., Serial No. 79144840 (January 18, 2017) [not precedential].Applicant is the governing body of football (soccer) in Germany, and is in charge of the league system and the national teams. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
’” (quoting In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, 209 F.R.D. 251, 262 (D.D.C. 2002)). [2] See, e.g., Wachtel ex rel. [read post]
20 May 2022, 12:37 pm
So we get sued, lose, pay fees (theirs and ours), and we're back to square one. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:18 am
A trademark owner, particularly in the case of a very strong and unique mark, will never be able to stop all improper usage by the ordinary consumer (e.g., on Twitter, E-Bay, and the like). [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 12:04 pm
And what about innocuous technical defects in a signing ceremony (e.g., two witnesses are present, but only one signs the document)? [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:48 am
They’re not very good at letting people know they’re listening, but listen they do. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 5:02 pm
So we're going to try a little experiment. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:42 am
It’s not a restatement of the topic of the meeting – e.g. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:42 am
It’s not a restatement of the topic of the meeting – e.g. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:14 am
See e.g., In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices Litigation, 2010 WL 1652863, *1-2 (N.D. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:08 pm
Sprint Nextel Corp.; Oren Bar-Gill & Rebecca Stone, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology); 5. determining whether contracts involving reproductive technologies are enforceable (e.g., In re Baby M; A.Z. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
For further details with respect to the 2024 re-proposal and the 2016 proposal, please refer to our May 6, 2024 memorandum, FDIC, OCC and FHFA Re-Propose Incentive Compensation Rule, and our April 27, 2016 memorandum, Details Emerge: Proposed Regulation of Incentive Compensation at Large Financial Institutions. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
A number of retailers in the Netherlands, including H&M and C&A, had started retailing clothes that featured similar stripes (e.g. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:52 am
Meanwhile, the Democrats are more than willing to surrender in policy terms, even though the American public (unlike the Democrats themselves) takes the Democrats' side substantively (e.g., with regard to the mix between tax and spending changes). [read post]
