Search for: "In re Miller " Results 1401 - 1420 of 4,270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm by Kathleen Krafft Miller
Kathleen Krafft Miller is an attorney at Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (While the opinion notes the trial court rejected Respondents’ and Real Parties’ “various procedural defenses” – which were not specified in the opinion, but which in fact included statute of limitations, mootness, and res judicata/collateral estoppel – the Court of Appeal expressly declined to reach these issues, stating in a footnote:  “We need not address the Ohlsons’ various procedural defenses because we affirm the trial… [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
This was on the basis that the government was not a (interested) party to the proceedings and that, by reaching such a finding, the Court would make it difficult for the government to “re-open” this question and/or to challenge the reasoning in MGN v UK in a future case in Strasbourg [29]. (2a) Application of the rule in MGN v UK: Miller and Flood Proceeding on the basis that it would normally breach a publisher’s article 10 rights to require it to reimburse any… [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:50 am by Matt Miller, Registered Patent Attorney
The post What is Bitcoin – Part 2 – Practical Benefits appeared first on New Orleans Patent Lawyer Matt Miller. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:08 am by AIDAN WILLS, MATRIX
This was on the basis that the government was not a (interested) party to the proceedings and that, by reaching such a finding, the Court would make it difficult for the government to “re-open” this question and/or to challenge the reasoning in MGN v UK in a future case in Strasbourg [29]. (2a) Application of the rule in MGN v UK: Miller and Flood Proceeding on the basis that it would normally breach a publisher’s art 10 rights to require it to reimburse any… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
., In re Vaeck, 947 F.2d 488, 495-96 (Fed. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court’s decision was based on A1P1 because “no argument based on article 6 or article 8 was raised at all on behalf of Mr Miller (or Mr Flood)”. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:55 am by J. Dana Stuster
“I won’t say those who fell are Christian or Muslim...I will say that they’re Egyptian,” he said in a speech. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 7:29 am by Nora Ellingsen, Lisa Daniels
In other words, the very dataset we’re consulting is the one most apt to support the administration’s position. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 1:29 pm by Kathleen Krafft Miller
Kathleen Krafft Miller is an attorney at Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 11:09 pm by Jarod Bona
The federal district court judge, after allowing plaintiffs a couple opportunities to re-plead following dismissals without prejudice, finally dismissed the case with prejudice. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
However, when he thought the North was losing the war and that he would not be re-elected, he encouraged Frederick Douglass to familiarize slaves with the Emancipation Proclamation. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The murderous terror attack in Westminster this week raised difficult question about journalistic ethics, with a number of newspapers being criticised for publishing pictures of the dead and injured which, it was suggested, were ‘too intrusive. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Northern Ireland In the case of  Re Doran (No.2) [2017] NIQB 24 the High Court has found that the decision of the Department for the Economy to publish the names of “natural persons” in receipt of Renewal Heat Incentive Scheme funding was in breach of the Data Protection Act 1998. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner
Judge Spath grows more frustrated as the hearing continues: “Who can’t turn off the unauthorized access they’re attempting to get in a classified system? [read post]