Search for: "Jones v. District Court"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 3,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2014, 8:44 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:53 pm
Last Wednesday, I noted in this post some of the reasons why Judge Carney's decision in Jones v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
The case is Jones v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:00 pm
District Court for the Central District of California issued an extraordinary ruling yesterday that California’s death penalty is unconstitutional, vacating Ernest Dewayne Jones’s death sentence. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:36 am
Jones presiding. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 12:21 am
District Court, Central District of California. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm
Here are the facts of the case from the decision of the California Supreme Court on direct appeal, People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:33 am
Case citation: Jones v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:33 am
Justice Burke argued that the Court had said in Rios v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012). [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
In other news, the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Asarco LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:29 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio accepted this argument without much of a second thought. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
More Nonsense on Differential Diagnosis The Supreme Court recently addressed differential etiology in Matrixx Initiatives, in stunningly irrelevant and errant dicta: “We note that courts frequently permit expert testimony on causation based on evidence other than statistical significance. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 9:33 am
Jones, which was reviewed by Florida's First District Court of Appeal. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
The alleged harassment was simply not severe or pervasive enough to be actionable (Jones v Divercare Afton Oaks). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
Jones and the D.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:06 am
Although the district court accepted this argument, we find no authority for concluding that a Rule 41(g) motion is a prerequisite to a motion to [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:50 am
Sarah Jones v. [read post]
