Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 1401 - 1420 of 20,066
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2023, 8:19 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Disney did not do anything other than issue a statement, and the words in that statement (which were too mild and came notably late, I would add) criticized the then-new "Don't Say Gay" bill. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:44 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
App. 2011) held that [B]oth medical necessity and a causal connection between the compensable injury and the requested treatment must exist. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 1:34 am by Jack Bogdanski
Now, don't get me wrong. [read post]
Does this premise hold up for matters in which those who are identified as oppressors in this oppressor/oppressed morality drama fare worse than those identified as the oppressed? [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 10:38 am by Chip Merlin
An Appraiser or Umpire shall not undertake any Appraisal concerning matters with which they are not currently competent and knowledgeable, or which otherwise exceeds their current expertise; Appraisers and Umpires must be competent for the particular matter. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Is the target subject matter clear? [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am by Samuel I. Portnoy
Based largely on an email from the plaintiff to his counsel stating “[t]he strategy was to file these complaints to force a settlement,” the District Court held (presumably after resolving assertions of privilege) that the complaint was filed for an improper purpose in violation of Rule 11(b)(1). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am by Samuel I. Portnoy
Based largely on an email from the plaintiff to his counsel stating “[t]he strategy was to file these complaints to force a settlement,” the District Court held (presumably after resolving assertions of privilege) that the complaint was filed for an improper purpose in violation of Rule 11(b)(1). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am by Samuel I. Portnoy
Based largely on an email from the plaintiff to his counsel stating “[t]he strategy was to file these complaints to force a settlement,” the District Court held (presumably after resolving assertions of privilege) that the complaint was filed for an improper purpose in violation of Rule 11(b)(1). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:25 am by Dan Bressler
” “As to the Gloucester County matter, the Flynn firm argued that the court erred in denying its motion to be relieved as counsel and claimed that Vernon’s dissolution action against Carabasi created a disqualifying conflict of interest under RPC 1.7(a). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal found for Mrs B. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 8:28 am by Andrew Delaney
As an initial matter, the state argues mom’s appeal is late—filed three months after the order transferring custody. [read post]