Search for: "Minor v. Black"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2013, 11:07 am
The ACLU will be at the Supreme Court later this month fighting to uphold the Voting Rights Act in our case, Shelby County v Holder. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
While we know from Reno v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:20 am
The following contribution to our Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm
In South Carolina v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 10:46 am
” Words of wisdom from Justice Hugo Black as codified in Gideon v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
No link shall be provided to the Episcopal blogger's Website, in order to prevent his audience from being even bigger -- you will read here his entire post, and so need not go there yourself to read the same ignorant words again.This particularly ill-informed Episcopalian writes, to those who do visit his Website, as follows (his words are in black, and my fisks of what he writes are hereafter in blue):'Diocese of Diane' Hearing Postponed Right off the bat, our Episcopal co-blogger… [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
SCHLAG v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
SCHLAG v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:14 pm
By David Worley In Zagaja v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
Massachusetts Accident Co., 307 Mass. 246, 250, 29 N.E.2d 825, 827 (1940) (the preponderance standard requires more than showing that the chances mathematically favor a fact in dispute; the proponent must prove the proposition in dispute such that the jurors form an actual belief in the truth of the proposition) (“It has been held not enough that mathematically the chances somewhat favor a proposition to be proved; for example, the fact that colored automobiles made in the current year… [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
Wade and Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:08 pm
Knight v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:37 am
Among other things, Bork had voiced opposition to constitutional equality for women; to equal rights for blacks and other minorities, enforced through the federal Commerce Clause; to rules that required all voters to have an equal vote in elections; and to basic regulatory protections of health and safety. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
10 Myths and Facts About Workers' Compensation Posted by LexisNexis Workers' Comp Law Community Staff The LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation Law Community and the award-winning blog Work Comp Roundup have teamed up to present some common myths and facts about workers’ compensation. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:06 pm
R.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 12:34 am
Report: Family Law.R (ota of Kadri) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 1432 (7 November 2012)Three appeals (with permission applications) re. age assessments of unaccompanied minors. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:06 am
The agents also seized two cell phones from Green: a black MetroPCS Samsung phone and a Blackberry device.U.S. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:30 pm
The court pointed to Sixth Circuit precedent holding that a fragrance-free workplace was objectively unreasonable and recognizing the burden such a broad policy would have on individual employees who would have to alter all of their personal habits to ensure that all products of daily-living, used in their private homes before coming into the workplace, were fragrant-free (Core v Champaign Cnty Bd of Cnty Comm’rs, October 17, 2012, Black, T). [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:29 pm
Attorney General's Office objected, stating that the population makeup of the state (78% white, 20% black, and 1% each Native American and Asian) made a single majority-minority district insufficient. [read post]
