Search for: "Newman, Appeal of" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2010, 1:43 pm by Sheppard Mullin
" According to Judge Newman, basic research may not be taken to the patent system before its practical application has been demonstrated. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:13 pm
The Griffins appealed. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:54 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Everyone’s Two Cents: Judge Newman added: Basic scientific principles are not the subject matter of patents, while their application is the focus of this law of commercial incentive. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:43 am by Michael C. Smith
In the midst of all the hoopla over last week's jury verdict against Microsoft in Judge Davis' court in Tyler, the Federal Circuit today (Newman, Rader, Linn) affirmed Judge Davis' grant of summary judgment of noninfringement in Microsoft's favor last March in Fenner v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
A first appeal "held the asserted claims invalid for lack of written description. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:25 pm
  On appeal, MacPherson argued that the government had violated his plea agreement in advocating the higher guideline at sentencing. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:24 am by Dennis Crouch
On appeal, Federal Circuit affirmed in an opinion written by Judge Moore and signed by Judges Newman and Bryson. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:40 am by Sam Hasler
For the latter, the Newman court found that such provisions may become voidable as unconscionable due to circumstances existing at the time of dissolution. 653 P.2d at 734-35. 163 In Justus, the Court of Appeals noted that we, in Boren, had cited approvingly to Newman. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge Newman's partial dissent:In the district court, ResQNet’s damages expert Dr. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:00 am
• Paul Michel: Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
On appeal - Because the district court's award relied on speculative and unreliable evidence divorced from proof of economic harm linked to the claimed invention and is inconsistent with sound damages jurisprudence, this court vacates the damages award and remands. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 1:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
Ongoing damages: The appellate panel did not consider the issue of ongoing damages (compulsory license) because that question was not appealed. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 1:29 pm
Herein, a tale of disingenuity, and an appeal decision greasing understanding of inducing infringement. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 7:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The appeal should be dismissed as moot. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 2:45 am by John L. Welch
That action, opined Judge Newman, has rendered the appeal concerning his first application moot (despite the resulting loss of Applicant's original priority date). [read post]