Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 1,949
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm
Allen v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:08 am
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Rogers v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:54 am
Her response: sometimes we want people not to have to pay for speech. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
Based upon a number of subjective well-being (SWB) surveys and neuroscience studies, people's remembered emotions are usually rosier than people's experienced emotions, and people are motivated to make choices based upon their predicted emotions which tend to coincide with their emotional memories. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:46 pm
(See People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:39 am
People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Judging by some of the comments on sites reporting on the ”Free Bieber” campaign, this idea is news to many people. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
" ruling in Thuiskopie v Opus for jiplp. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm
Metropolitan News-Enterprise: California S.Ct. grants review in People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:47 am
"Via Walter Reaves, comes word of Mechell v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Sampling – a cautionary tale — Finally, music attorney Ian Clifford talks about his work clearing samples and the lessons he’s learned. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
In Schmerber v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:33 am
(v) may want to include information about DNA Adoption Networking in their adoption education programs. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:43 am
A proposal to retain DNA samples taken from people who have been arrested but not charged with a crime for up to five years has come under criticism from the Joint Committee on Human Rights. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Inco was for many years the major employer in the Port Colborne area, employing as many as 2,000 people. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
While general support for the death penalty has fallen to 67 percent nationally, and while the public is particularly concerned about wrongful executions, let's not confuse a national sample with the audience at that Republican debate. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:31 pm
McCleskey v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
She was also the individual who calculated the probability of selecting an unrelated individual at random from the pertinent sample group who would have the same DNA profile as that found on the shirt.Does the Confrontation Clause, as interpreted in Crawford v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am
(Perhaps we could learn more about the way law library stakeholders think about information by presenting them with samplings of articles, and inquiring as to how the stakeholders would “expect” to find those articles.) [read post]
