Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 55,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2009, 3:59 pm
The bill builds on today's Clean Air Act, adding the new program to limit and reduce overall carbon pollution while maintaining the tools for curbing global warming pollution that were upheld in the Supreme Court's landmark 2007 decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 9:34 am
Power Integrations, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
Metcalf v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 2:43 am
Baxter v Mannion [2011] EWCA Civ 120; [2011] WLR (D) 54 “Where a registrar of the Land Registry found that a person who had been registered as the proprietor of land as adverse possessor had not in fact been in adverse possession of the land, he could exercise his power under paragraph 5(a) of Schedule 4 to the Land Registration Act 2002 to alter the register for the purpose of correcting a mistake, so as to restore the original proprietor. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:29 am
Breakspear and others v Ackland and another [2008] EWHC 220 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 52 “Generally the confidence which ordinarily attached to a wish letter was such that, for the better discharge of their confidential functions, the trustees need not disclose it to beneficiaries merely because they requested it unless, in their view, disclosure was in the interests of the sound administration of the trust, and the discharge of their powers and discretions. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:38 am
There was no power to make a restraint order in respect of property outside the jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:04 am
Kavanaugh issued a statement respecting the denial of certiorari in Paul v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 5:18 am
The electronic ABA Journal summarizes this report from the NY Post (URL below): St John's revoked the admission of a 3L scholarship student who is #3 in the class and has what looks to be a stellar resume because he did not reveal all the details of a since-expunged drug conviction when he was 21 or 22 (in 1999). [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 4:43 am
The case coming before the court, Matter of Linares v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
In his seminal work calling executive privilege a “constitutional myth,” Raoul Berger wrote that when “seeking to ascertain the boundaries between the conflicting claims of Congress and the President, questions of practical convenience need to be separated from the issue of constitutional power. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:53 am
Supreme Courtgranted certiorariin Golan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:05 am
The post ALAN WORDEN, ET AL. v. 3203 FARMINGTON LLC, ET AL. appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:15 am
The post ALAN WORDEN, ET AL. v. 3203 FARMINGTON LLC, ET AL. appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 4:18 am
In Hirsch v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:51 am
No power to add late libel claim Adelson and Another v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:54 am
Cherry Tree Investments Ltd v Landmain Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 736; [2012] WLR (D) 170 “Where it was alleged that a registered charge included an extended power of sale which was included in a facility agreement but was not referred to in the charge, the correct approach was to bring a properly pleaded and proved claim for rectification of the charge, not to seek to apply a ‘corrective construction’ of the charge by reference to extrinsic material.” WLR Daily,… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:56 am
Regina (Boahen) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2010] EWCA Civ 585; [2010] WLR (D) 143 “An immigration officer at the port of entry had discretionary power to cancel a visa granted overseas on the ground that the purpose of the visit was not same as stated in the visa granted and to refuse leave to enter the UK. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:21 am
Board can depart from its own decisions Gibson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
By Andrew Williams -- Earlier today, in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:24 am
R (Coleman) v Governor of Wayland Prison and another; [2009] WLR (D) 132 “While a mobile telephone found in the possession of a prisoner might properly be taken away from him, neither rule 43(5) of the Prison Rules 1999 nor the common law provided a prison governor with power to destroy the mobile telephone. [read post]
