Search for: "RING v. STATE"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 1,995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
” This is hardly a ringing endorsement. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 3:17 pm
But in a second decision, Pliva v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:54 pm
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:11 pm
The piece describes his hobbies and interests — including, but not limited to, Lord of the Rings — and talks about his father, who sounds like a somewhat odd character:Mark McDaniel, 58, on an Internet blog he started in January 2007, posted three times on and, inside of a week, abandoned, wrote:“Why am I interesting. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm
As noted in the article published in the Florida Bar News, Justices on the Florida Supreme Court have been openly expressing their dissatisfaction with the death penalty scheme, and calling it into question in light of Ring v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:22 pm
In sum, the court found that the Florida Death Penalty Statute violated Ring v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:52 am
The Kat brings news of the decision of the Court of Appeal (Sir Robin Jacob providing a judgment with which Ward and Patten LJJ agreed) in the latest round of the Schütz v Werit dispute ([2011] EWCA Civ 927) – this time on the interpretation of s68 PA 1977. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:59 pm
[My federalism alarm bell just started ringing.] [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
"Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the law firm. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:42 am
SmallThe interwebs have been abuzz this week with gleeful snarking about Sanches v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:56 pm
The agent also stated that lying about the country of origin on customs documents constitutes a material false statement in violation of the federal criminal code, citing United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:05 pm
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 11:57 am
” United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:53 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
Rather, United States v. [read post]
