Search for: "SELLERS v. SELLERS" Results 1401 - 1420 of 5,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2012, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  They sue sellers, sundry others, and their CPAs whom they say were hired to do the due diligence on the value of the business. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
What they appear to be saying in their 398-paragraph complaint is that they bought a $729,000 house, and borrowed $739,000 for it, because the seller lowballed them into thinking they were going to get the house for $719,000. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
While a Canadian court may give deference to the rules set by the seller, how closely a seller needs to follow those rules is not yet clear. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am by Tom Pritchard
Court of Appeal decision In overturning the decision of first instance, Lord Justice Clark (with whom Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Patten agreed) relied on the following reasons: In reviewing the case law regarding contractual interpretation (Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Gan Insurance Co Ltd v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] CLC 1, 103 being particularly significant) it can be said that “the clearer the language the less appropriate it may be to construe or… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Benjamin Hager
  On the other hand, if the interest rate increases, V must pay F, likely resulting in losses to V. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:03 pm
No tying arrangement existed because the defendants did not require dealers to include gap insurance products in the credit transactions the defendants purchased, or even to buy gap insurance products at all.The decision is Midwest Agency Services, Inc. v. [read post]