Search for: "STATE v MCDONALD" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak)   United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak)   United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
(I covered one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
Chicago, McDonald v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:01 pm by Rich Cassidy
I am thinking, of course, of the Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:42 am by Russ Bensing
  I’ve often bewailed the disparities in sentencing that have resulted from the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Supreme Court finally ruled that many restrictions on lawyer advertising violated free speech, in Bates v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:48 am
After the New York Times covered my exploits in the McDonald v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm by Giles Peaker
The question of ‘horizontal effect’ of the convention – the obligations on the Court as public body – will also be explored in the Supreme Court decision in McDonald v McDonald, (an English case on Art 8 and s.21 possession claims) which is awaited… Meanwhile, in other things that make you wonder ‘why on earth would you do that? [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:43 am by Stephen Halbrook
The Supreme Court has since ruled that it does, in McDonald v. [read post]