Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 1401 - 1420 of 3,713
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Also on H-Net is a review of Exit Strategies and State Building edited by Richard Caplan. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:57 am
The Roberts Court declared in Brown v Chamber of Commerce last term that California could not place anti-union-busting conditions on California's own state money. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:46 am by Christopher Wright
  Yang suggested that such a law might be too “undifferentiated” and therefore fail under Lujan v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
It is also intended "to deter sellers from making false and misleading representations in order to protect the public. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
The seller’s warning must be reasonably calculated to reach such persons, and the presence of an intermediate party will not by itself relieve the seller of this duty. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v Rafailov, 41 AD3d 603, 604; see also High Fashions Hair Cutters v Commercial Union Ins. [read post]