Search for: "Soling v. New York State"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 3,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2015, 7:06 pm
The defendants argued that a New York state court procedure that would allow for fraudulently obtained default judgments to be vacated en masse would be superior to a class action. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:06 pm
The defendants argued that a New York state court procedure that would allow for fraudulently obtained default judgments to be vacated en masse would be superior to a class action. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
New York City Dist. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
The magnet federal jurisdictions were the Second and Ninth Circuits, and state law claims were congregated in plaintiff-friendly venues such as California, Florida, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
We overrule Rueda's sole issue on appeal. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:03 pm
Although Italian copyright law names the composer as a joint author in motion pictures, the Southern District of New York still held that Morricone was not the author of the music which was, instead, a “work made for hire. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:03 pm
Although Italian copyright law names the composer as a joint author in motion pictures, the Southern District of New York still held that Morricone was not the author of the music which was, instead, a “work made for hire. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:59 pm
Oct. 22, 2010)Favors: EmployerLaw: New York [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:39 am
Rather, the EEOC’s own investigator did not recall investigating any stores except in Massena, New York and Tampa, Florida. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:49 am
The leading case addressing this issue: Delaware State College v Ricks, 449 US 250. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job.* Paragraph three of the agreement separately provided that Plaintiff agreed to adhere to departmental policies and procedures and would be terminated for his failure to do so, but provided no limitation on who would determine his guilt, nor did it waive any judicial review.The decision is posted on the Internet at:… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job.* Paragraph three of the agreement separately provided that Plaintiff agreed to adhere to departmental policies and procedures and would be terminated for his failure to do so, but provided no limitation on who would determine his guilt, nor did it waive any judicial review.The decision is posted on the Internet at:… [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am
Under section 702 of the New York LLC Law, as construed by the courts, an LLC member may apply for judicial dissolution if either (1) management is unable or unwilling to permit or promote the LLC’s “stated purpose” as expressed in the operating agreement or articles of organization, or (2) continuing the LLC is financially unfeasible. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 10:03 pm
Tremont Partner was the sole general partner of both funds. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
[A forthcoming article of mine in the New York University Journal of Law & Liberty.] [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 6:18 pm
Syndication Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:52 am
Because that conduct occurred in plaintiffs’ home states, under New York choice-of-law analysis the law of those states should apply.Celexa/Lexapro, slip op. at 8-9.Choice of law was the battle on the nationwide classes. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Vance concerns whether a New York grand jury can issue a subpoena to Mazars USA (Trump’s accounting firm) that would require Mazars to turn over Trump’s financial records as part of an investigation into possible violations of New York criminal law by several organizations and individuals. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 10:26 am
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:55 am
” This litigation arises out of a dispute among family members regarding ownership and control of Wilkens Farm (hereinafter the farm), a large family-owned farm located in Yorktown Heights, New York. [read post]
