Search for: "Spells v. Spells" Results 1401 - 1420 of 3,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 2:27 am by gmlevine
Take for example MOWITANIA, the Complainant’s trademark in Mowitania Wendt & Molitor GbR v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:11 am by Schachtman
In language that could well be a Sokol hoax on the vacuousness of post-modernist non-thinking, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued a press release to announce its judgment in N.W. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareAs I explain in my preview, the question in Bissonnette v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 8:46 pm
Bates set a Feb. 9 deadline for such a filing, issuing  an order in Hamlily v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
Section 3020-a disciplinary appealsAustin v NYC Board of Education, 280 A.D.2d 365The Austin decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, sets out the standards followed by the courts in considering appeals from Section 3020-a disciplinary determinations. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am by SHG
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:31 am by Venkat
. __ Plaintiffs’ failure to sue on behalf of a subclass that actually suffered out of pocket loss as a result of their information being posted online is telling, and probably spells the end of this lawsuit. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 7:21 am
  But post-Comcast, failing to account for damages spells defeat. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
| Friday Fantasies | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One) | HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio | Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme | Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
Sometimes the best judge of which side has the better legal argument is someone who doesn't care one way or the other about the outcome.Of course, all judges are supposed to be impartial. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:43 am by Paul Cruikshank
Lord Neuberger, Sumption and Toulson were of the view that, while previously it was open to the Council to accept a dodgy application, or remedy it themselves, s 67 of the 2006 Act spells out very clearly that: “…an application under section 53(5) of the 1981 Act is made when it is made in accordance with paragraph 1 of Schedule 14 to that Act [requiring a map of a 1:25,000 scale to be attached…]” meaning that an application cannot be made outwith those terms. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
Article 23 of the Constitution of Uganda[1] spells out the right to personal liberty under Ugandan law. [read post]