Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Pharmaceutical cases that warrant federal court multi-district litigation (MDL) treatment typically involve complex scientific and statistical issues. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Revisiting the Limits on Judicial Expression in the Digital Age: Striving Towards Proportionally in the Cyberintimidation Context, National Journal of Constitutional Law, 2018, Forthcoming, Karen Eltisand Yigal Mersel, University of Ottawa – Faculty of Law; Affiliate- CITP Princeton and The Jerusalem District Court Free Speech, Higher Education, and the PC Narrative,101 Minnesota L.Rev. 1987 (2017), Heidi Kitrosser, University of Minnesota –… [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am by SHG
  Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm by Mike Aylward
 These findings were largely set aside by the Second Appellate District on January 19, 2006. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Minnesota, the district court, and the dissent seem to think that we can simply ignore the hybrid-rights discussion from Smith because it was dicta…. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:59 pm by Roy Ginsburg
And, of course, the statute described above is Minnesota’s; other states have different statutory language or none at all. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:12 am by Erik B. von Zeipel
District Court for the District of Minnesota, TEKSystems filed suit against its former employee Hammernick for violating an agreement not to solicit TEKSystem’s employees and customers to go to its competitors. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:30 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
That’s the number of potential plaintiffs in a class action suit filed today in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
TwitterDecision Date: May 6, 2022 The United States District Court for the Northern District of California was asked to decide on the question of the violation of the right to free speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution in the backdrop of the “state-action doctrine” elaborated and backed by various precedents. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear an appeal in Jones v. [read post]