Search for: "State v. Cooper" Results 1401 - 1420 of 7,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2022, 9:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In response to the recent Equal Protection challenge to ICWA by a small number of states in Haaland v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
However, in its December 5, 2013 opinion in Venecia V. v August V., the Appellate Division, First Department, held that no malpractice had been committed, and no hearing was required to reach that conclusion. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:50 am by Wanda Gomez
” The brief urged the Court to re-examine the dual sovereignty doctrine, especially in light of the  expanded federalization of crime, in an age of cooperative federalism between federal and state  governments. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The court also rejected Plaintiff's argument that DOE's "Position Statement" was unsigned and undated hearsay, noting "Generally, administrative proceedings need not conform to all of the ... evidentiary rules adhered to in judicial tribunals", citing Matter of Church of Scientology of N.Y. v Tax Commn. of City of N.Y., 120 AD2 376, nor need an agency "state with specificity its detailed analysis," or "point to any… [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The court also rejected Plaintiff's argument that DOE's "Position Statement" was unsigned and undated hearsay, noting "Generally, administrative proceedings need not conform to all of the ... evidentiary rules adhered to in judicial tribunals", citing Matter of Church of Scientology of N.Y. v Tax Commn. of City of N.Y., 120 AD2 376, nor need an agency "state with specificity its detailed analysis," or "point to any… [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:41 am by NARF
Cayuga Nation (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act; Fee Lands; Reservation Disestablishment) Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:48 pm
However, Peter King of Sports Illustrated stated that the decision may not be the champagne-popping moment for the NFLPA. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:10 pm by Matthias Weller
In its judgment of 8 February 2024, the CJEU had to decide whether “the application of the Brussels Ibis Regulation be based solely on the fact that two parties with their seat in the same Member State agree on the jurisdiction of courts of another EU Member State. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:09 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Khan & Ors v R [2008] EWCA Crim 531 (14 March 2008) Burgess, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 516 (08 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Manchester City Council v Benjamin [2008] EWCA Civ 189 (13 March 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Experience Hendrix LLC & anor v Times Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 458 (Ch) (11 March 2008) Stow & Ors v Stow & Ors [2008] EWHC 495 (Ch) (14 March 2008)… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:24 pm by Dwight Sullivan
My understanding is that the first of the SEALs cases to be tried will be United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:04 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm by Jeffrey D. Polsky
Still, there are some California employment law aspects of last week’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
AUSTIN — The timeline played the starring role during the opening arguments at the jury trial of the United States v Paul Kruse. [read post]