Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 1401 - 1420 of 7,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
§1322(b)(2) states that the plan may: "modify the rights of holders of secured claims, other than a claim secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor’s principal residence, or of holders of unsecured claims, or leave unaffected the rights of holders of any class of claims. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am by Ben
The ISP then passes the notice to the account holder with each notice costing $25. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm by Kalvis Golde
Miniard 23-444Issue: Whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 5:39 pm by Ken Moon
 The appeal decision in Capitol Records v ReDigi issued December 2018 did not attract anywhere near the same attention as the 2015 trial decision. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Justice Edward White Justice White gave as his rationale a citation from a previous case [United States v. [read post]