Search for: "State v. Michael A." Results 1401 - 1420 of 13,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2010, 3:20 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Michael Reisman, East African Piracy and the Defense of World Public OrderThomas A. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 8:41 pm
Via Michael Masinter I hear, After oral argument this morning, the Florida supreme court unanimously struck from the November ballot amendments 7 and 9 proposed by the Taxation and Budget Reform Commission. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:52 pm
Over at The WSJ Law Blog, there's a nice profile of Richard Diaz, the Florida solo who represents Michael Williams, a defendant who is challenging the constitutionality of a federal child-pornography statute in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am by Kelly Becker
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:17 am
"  Here is how it starts:Last week, in Danforth v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Christopher Hutchings (partner) and Michael Frost of Hamlins LLP acted for Mr Sloutsker in this case and instructed Adrienne Page QC of 5RB. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:22 am
Summary of Decision issued September 3, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From Magistrate Judge Michael Hegarty's opinion Friday in Glapion-Pressley v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
The court found that Michael's opinion was contradicted by decedent's medical records and the testimony of her physician, who stated that decedent was in full control of her faculties during an examination on the day that she executed the 2015 Will. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for Wyoming will be a senior assistant state attorney general, Peter Kenneth Michael, of Cheyenne. [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:05 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
” Unlike Galarsa and Piplack, the court expressly held that the representative claim in state court should be stayed pending the outcome of individual arbitration. [read post]